home
corporate
exploration
project summary
announcements
research reports
presentations
reports
contact
subscribe for email announcements

|
Mutooroo Copper-Cobalt Project
Summary
Mutooroo is a lode-style massive sulphide deposit located in South Australia about 60 km west of Broken Hill containing an estimated 13.1 million tonnes of 1.48% copper plus appreciable cobalt, gold and sulphur. Metallurgical studies indicate that a modern roasting / acid plant would be capable of efficiently recovering all valuable products including sulphuric acid, copper, cobalt, iron ore and electricity.
History
The Mutooroo copper mine was worked in the period between 1887-1914, with reported production of some 6,000 tonnes of mostly hand-picked oxidised material, including 2,557 tonnes of 6.58% copper and a parcel of 218 tonnes of 19.3% copper.
More than 30 diamond drillholes were completed by Broken Hill South in the 1970s into the deeper sulphide bearing portion of the lode zone resulting in a sulphide copper resource estimate of 8.7 million tonnes of 1.9% copper. This historic resource figure may not comply with current JORC reporting standards, but is considered to be reliable in light of the number of diamond drillholes that it is based on.
Since that time the prospect has lain largely dormant until Havilah commenced exploration in 2005. Havilah's initial objective was to drill the largely untested top 200 metres of the lode system for an open pit deposit.
Click to enlarge
Geology
The Mutooroo copper-cobalt mineralisation occurs as a series of stacked sulphide rich lodes developed within a 450 west dipping shear zone that is largely confined to an amphibolite sill within Broken Hill age high grade metamorphic rocks.
The orebody shows a distinctive vertical zonation caused by weathering and oxidation:
Completely Oxidised (top 25-35 metres) - to an iron oxide-quartz fragment gossan/ironstone with local malachite – atacamite – chrysocolla – cuprite mineralisation.
Transitional (underlying the above) - a variably developed, secondary, supergene pyrite (after pyrrhotite) –chalcocite – covellite - quartz dominant zone.
Primary Sulphide - pyrrhotite dominant – chalcopyrite - pyrite, disseminated and massive sulphide mineralisation. High grade, primary sulphide milled breccia mineralisation is typically composed of pyrrhotite (60%) - quartz fragments (25%) - pyrite (5%) - chalcopyrite (5%) with local fragments of variably altered country rock.
Massive Sulphide Ore - Click to enlarge
Havilah Exploration
Havilah's drilling initially targeted the largely undrilled top 200 metres of the lode zone in the search for an open pit copper resource. Surprisingly good copper and cobalt grades were intersected at comparatively shallow depths in the sulphide lodes as follows:
- 13 metres of 2.2% Cu and 0.29% Co from 36-49 m in drillhole MTRC01
- 31 metres of 1.71% Cu and 0.18% Co from 78-109 m in drillhole MTRC044
- 26 metres of 1.55% Cu and 0.18% Co from 101-127 m in drillhole MTRC045
Click to enlarge
Subsequent diamond drilling has confirmed the earlier percussion drilling results as follows:
- 13.3 metres of 2.58% Cu and 0.26% Co from 42.2-55.5 m in drillhole MTDD112
- 27 metres of 2.26% Cu and 0.25% Co from 84.5-111.5 m in drillhole MTDD113
Feasibility Studies
Based on more than 7,000 assayed samples from 250 drillholes, Havilah has estimated an initial JORC compliant combined measured, indicated and inferred resource of 13.1 million tonnes of 1.48% copper. The technical basis for this resource estimation is outlined in the table at the end of this section
Click to enlarge
Apart from the contained 192,000 tonnes of copper there are also substantial amounts of gold (92,000 oz), cobalt (17,500 tonnes), sulphur (2.5 million tonnes) and iron in the orebody as summarised in the following table
Mutooroo Metal Inventory – October 2010
| |
|
|
Contained metal |
| Classification |
Category |
Tonnes |
Cu tonnes |
Co tonnes |
Au oz |
S tonnes |
| meas+indic |
Sulphide |
5,846,563 |
76,795 |
8,016 |
42,829 |
1,169,313 |
| All |
Sulphide |
12,529,912 |
191,707 |
17,542 |
92,665 |
2,505,982 |
| Current price (A$) |
|
|
8,400/t |
38,000/t |
1,381/oz |
200/t |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Supported by JORC resource |
|
|
|
| |
Estimate only |
|
|
|
|
|
Estimate assuming sulphide ore contains 20% sulphur |
|
The feasibility study drilling has focussed on comprehensively defining only that part of the resource that was considered directly amenable to open pit mining, based on an open pit shell outlined by earlier scoping studies.Thusfar, only approximately 700 metres of the more than 2000 metres of strike of the mineralised structure has been drilled to resource status.
The resource block model forms the basis for detailed mine design work currently being conducted by an experienced mining engineer.
The objective is to generate an optimum open pit mine design using current estimates of capital and operating costs in order to develop an economic model for mining the Mutooroo deposit.
Future Development Options
Mutooroo contains over 2.5 million tonnes of sulphur and is therefore a potentially significant feedstock source for the production of sulphuric acid. Metallurgical testwork has shown that the sulphide ore can be successfully roasted to produce sulphuric acid , and the copper and cobalt can be leached from the calcine residue, which is actually very pure iron ore. The roasting and acid generation process is highly exothermic and considerable electricity can be generated from the harnessed heat.
A processing flow sheet and indicative costs for a 500,000 tonne per annum roaster and sulphuric acid plant to treat Mutooroo sulphide ore was prepared by an experienced metallurgical consultant. First pass cost estimates show that to construct a roaster and acid plant with electricity co-generation will cost approximately $250-300 million and will require large quantities of high quality water. Given the high projected future demand for sulphuric acid in South Australia, it is likely that all sulphuric acid produced could be consumed locally, which is a major positive factor for the project.
An alternative strategy also supported by metallurgical testwork is to recover the majority of the copper as high grade concentrate by floatation followed by roasting as show in the following flowsheet.
Click to enlarge
Havilah continues to actively seek a partner with necessary processing expertise to assist with development of the Mutooroo project, either in Australia or overseas.
Resource Assessment and Reporting Criteria
The following table provides a summary of important criteria related to the assessment and reporting of the Mutooroo Copper - Cobalt resource.
Criteria |
Status |
Estimating and Reporting of Mineral Resources |
| Havilah drillholes used in resource estimation |
• A total of 206 RC and 22 DD drillholes totaling approximately 25,588
metres are included. This includes a total of approximately 2,161m of
drill core and 23,427m of RC samples. This data was used to define the
measured and indicated part of the resource |
| Non-Havilah drillholes used in resource estimation |
• 22 Mines Exploration (MEPL) diamond drillholes completed in the
1960s and totaling approximately 12,000m were used to define the
deeper, inferred part of the resource.
• There is good general correlation of the geology and assay data
between these earlier drillholes and Havilah drillholes although only the
higher sulphide intervals were sampled by MEPL and assayed for Cu
with only limited Au and Co analyses. |
| Drilling techniques |
All RC holes were drilled using standard face sampling hammers with
bit sizes ranging from 120mm to 136mm.
• Diamond core sizes ranged from NQ (50mm) to PQ3 (83mm) for
Havilah holes and BQ (36mm) and NQ for MEPL holes. Triple tube
methods were used where required to maximize core recoveries.
• Havilah drill core was routinely orientated mainly with ACE orientation
tools. |
| Sampling techniques |
• RC assay samples averaging 2-3kg were riffle split as 1m intervals.
• Half core samples averaging 0.5m were cut using a diamond saw for
Havilah holes.
• Half core samples averaging 1.5m were mechanically split for MEPL
holes. |
| Drill sample recovery |
• Overall RC sample recoveries and diamond drill core recoveries were
very good and are considered adequate for interpretation purposes.
• Core recovery for Havilah diamond drillholes averaged 98 %.
• Core recovery for MEPL holes within mineralisation appears to have
been good with losses only documented in mica schist zones. |
| Logging |
• All Havilah RC samples and drillcore was logged by experienced
geologists directly into a digital logging system with data uploaded into
an Excel spreadsheet database.
• All Havilah drillcore and RC chip trays have been photographed.
• All Havilah drillcore is stored at Cockburn.
• There is some remaining MEPL core stored at the PIRSA core library
at Glenside. Hardcopy logs have been coded and entered into the
database. |
| Quality of assay data and laboratory tests |
• Havilah samples were assayed by Amdel (2005-2006) and ALS (2007
onwards) using similar methods (multi acid digest with ICP analysis for
base metals and fire assay method for gold). Methods used are
considered to be appropriate.
• Assay data accuracy and precision was continuously checked through
submission of field and laboratory standards, blanks and repeats which
were inserted at a nominal rate of approximately 1 per 50 drill samples.
No data quality issues of significance were identified. |
| Verification of drilling methods and sampling |
• 5 diamond holes in close proximity (4-13m) to RC holes were
analysed with comparisons made for the relative intersection widths,
hole size, volume differences, metre x %Cu, metre x %Co and metre x
ppm Au, RC sample size and quality and any possible contamination
issues. It was found that although there were wide variations in total
copper metal and gold metal calculations between RC and diamond
holes, the overall average RC and drillcore metal calculations produced
relatively similar results (within 10% for Cu, 21% for Co and within 13%
for gold. There was no significant observed bias between the drill
methods and no significant differences in intersection widths. No issues
that could significantly affect the resource calculation were identified. |
| Location of drillholes |
• Drillhole collar coordinates (Havilah and MEPL) were surveyed in
UTM coordinates using a differential GPS system with an x:y:z
accuracy of 20cm:20cm:40cm.
• Most Havilah RC holes have been surveyed using digital multi shot
survey cameras on 10m downhole intervals. Of 206 holes only 12
shallow holes were unable to be surveyed due to hole collapse.
• Havilah diamond holes were surveyed at approximately 30m
downhole intervals using a digital multi shot survey camera.
• MEPL holes were surveyed using a combination of acid etch and
tropari methods. Distance between effective surveys averaged 56m
with some surveys excluded due to excessive dip or azimuth variations. |
| Drillhole spacing and distribution |
• Havilah drilling was completed on nominal 50m sections perpendicular
to the strike of the mineralised lodes (average 025º grid) targeting the
lodes from surface down to 250m below surface. Holes were drilled
towards the east at -60º and RC are spaced at 25m along the drill lines
with some deeper diamond holes spaced at 50m.
• Earlier MEPL holes were also drilled at right angles to the lodes and
were generally spaced at 150m intervals targeting mineralisation
between 150m and 560m below surface.
• The intersection angle of most holes between 70 and 90 degrees
depending on hole deviations.
• Resource drilling is predominantly concentrated between 493200E
and 494100E and between 6430400N and 6432000N. |
Estimating and Reporting of Mineral Resources |
| Database integrity |
Examination of the database has not revealed any issues of concern
that could significantly affect the current resource estimation. |
| Geological interpretation |
• The Mutooroo copper-cobalt mineralisation occurs as a series of en
echelon, locally structurally remobilised, sulphide rich breccia
zones/lodes developed within a locally altered shear/fracture zone
largely confined to an amphibolite body. The amphibolite body/sill is
flanked by a high grade deformed felsic gneiss and schist package.
• The mineralisation trends NNE and dips to the west at approx 45º.
• The upper 30-40m is oxidised and consists of iron oxides and quartz
fragments with local secondary copper minerals including atacamite,
chrysocolla, malachite and cuprite.
• A variably developed secondary/supergene sulphide zone occurs
below the base of oxidation and extends down along the footwall and
hanging contacts of most lodes. Secondary vuggy/powdery pyrite after
pyrrhotite occurs along with chalcocite, bornite/covellite and remnant
chalcopyrite. Secondary sulphides have been intersected up to 250m
below surface with the thicker lodes having a selvedge of secondary
sulphides around a core of primary sulphides while thinner lodes are
commonly completely replaced by secondary sulphides.
• Primary sulphides are dominated by pyrrhotite with lesser pyrite and
chalcopyrite. Breccia fragments include quartz and a range of variably
altered wall rock fragments. Primary pyrrhotite dominant mineralisation
has been intersected from 35m vertical depth.
• Sulphide lodes have been interpreted generally using a minimum 10%
logged sulphide content. Most lode contacts are relatively sharp with
generally only minor disseminated sulphides occurring outside the lode
margins.
• Six lodes with good continuity from section to section were modeled
and used in the resource estimation. Other discontinuous or
crosscutting sulphide zones have not been included in the resource at
this stage. |
| Estimation and Modeling Techniques |
• Polygons and hence triangulations are based on interpretations
completed on nominal 50m sections for Mutooroo.
• Triangulated interpretations have been generated for the following
lithological domains: Min1, Min2, Min3, Min4, Min5, Min6
• Triangulated interpretations were also generated for the base of
oxidation and each of the above domains were estimated separately
for oxidised and unoxidised material.
• The block model was constructed with parent blocks of 10mE by
10mN by 10mRL with sub blocks available to a minimum of 1mE by
2mN by 2mRL.
• Inverse distance was used to estimate Cu, Au and
Co grades and specific gravity separately for all domains and
oxidation states.
• The search directions for each estimation was aligned with relevant
geological correlation and distances based on drill hole spacing.
Unfolding was used during estimation to interpolate grades and
specific gravity honouring spatial orebody geometry.
• 1m assay composites were used with length weighting used in
estimation.
• A minimum of 1 and maximum of 5 composites were used per estimate. |
| Moisture |
• Tonnes have been estimated on a dry basis. |
| Cut-off parameters |
• No cut off parameters have been applied as the resource is
constrained by geological boundaries of sulphide bearing lodes. |
| Bulk density |
• A total of 653 Havilah core samples were measured for density using
the weight in air vs weight in water method.
• Results were geocoded to allow for SGs to be calculated for the main
rock and mineralisation types which were then applied to all Havilah RC
and diamond drill intersections. These calculated SGs were then block
modeled and compared to measured SGs with excellent correlation.
• All MEPL mineralised intervals were given an SG of 3.45 which was
based on the conversion of a "tonnage factor" of 10.5 cu ft/ton, which
was used in the 1973 pre JORC resource calculations. No information
on background for this "tonnage factor" has been found but is very
close to Havilah calculations for fresh sulphide lode material. |
| Classification |
• Mineral resources have been classified on the basis of geological
confidence in the continuity of mineralisation and the quality of the
data used. As a result the deeper mineralisation outlined by the older
MEPL drilling has been categorized as inferred due to the wider drill
spacing, downhole survey techniques and incomplete assay data.
Only Havilah drill data has been used in the measured and indicated
resource envelopes.
• In the geologist's opinion there is an extremely
low likelihood that further drilling within the measured and indicated
resource envelope would materially alter the current resource estimate. |
|